We were billing global on studies we only read
Radiology Billing Company
Radiology Billing Services
for USA Providers
A radiologist rarely owns the scanner. With teleradiology, they may not even be in the same state as the patient. That makes the professional and technical halves of a radiology claim more separate than almost anywhere else in medicine. Our radiology billing services track who did what, and from where, on every study.
96%avg. net collection rate across TruCare clients



Book a demo
Or call (760) 589-6611
Results across TruCare clients
96%
>95%
−37%
−38%
Why practices choose our radiology medical billing services
Rated 4.8 / 5
Verified client reviews
What we handle, across every modality
View all servicesWe get your radiologists enrolled everywhere they read
Multi-state enrollmentTeleradiology credentialingRevalidation
The scan and the read often happen in two different places.
Six places radiology revenue goes missing
The wrong component was billed
Billing global on a study where the practice only provided the interpretation, or the reverse, does not match what the practice actually did and is a routine, avoidable denial.
A teleradiology enrollment gap went unnoticed
A radiologist reading for a new facility in a state the group is not yet enrolled in produces claims that fail at the most basic level, regardless of the quality of the read.
Screening mammography was billed as diagnostic, or the reverse
These carry different cost-sharing rules under Medicare, and a same-day conversion from screening to diagnostic needs its own modifier to be recognized correctly.
A compliance step was built around a defunct federal program
Time spent on a clinical decision support consultation requirement that CMS has already paused does not protect a claim and distracts from the commercial prior authorization that actually governs it now.
Contrast administration was not billed separately
Contrast media carries its own billable code, and folding it into the imaging study instead of billing it on its own line leaves revenue uncollected.
An interventional procedure was billed like a diagnostic study
These cases run on surgical-style global period logic, and billing them like a routine scan misrepresents the actual work performed.
Rated on the platforms that matter



Our service offerings
Every modality and every setting
X-ray and general diagnostic radiology
CT and MRI
Mammography and breast imaging
Ultrasound
Nuclear medicine and PET
Teleradiology
Interventional radiology, briefly
Independent diagnostic testing facility billing
What actually makes this work
Billers who confirm component ownership before coding
Multi-state enrollment tracked against where your radiologists actually read
No disruption to how your practice already runs
What actually causes radiology claims to fail
Curious what your denials are actually costing you?
Request a billing auditThe recurring six:

Global billed when only one component applied
Enrollment gap for a new teleradiology relationship
Screening and diagnostic mammography confused
Missing authorization from a radiology benefit manager
Contrast not billed separately
Interventional procedure billed like diagnostic imaging
The codes your radiology revenue runs on
Walk through your coding with usThe ones that matter most:
Modifiers 26 and TC
Professional component for interpretation alone, technical component for equipment and staffing alone. Neither applies when one entity bills the complete global service.
We connect to the EHR you already use
Check for your systems
Deep integrations with all EHRs
TruCare connects seamlessly with your existing workflows — no switching required.
What actually moved for this specialty this year
The federal Appropriate Use Criteria program continued its wind-down
Having been paused and formally rescinded at the regulatory level in 2024, the related CMS quality measure for cardiac stress imaging not meeting appropriate use criteria was finalized for removal from MIPS for the 2026 performance year, confirming the program’s continued retreat rather than any renewed enforcement.
Commercial prior authorization remains the active gatekeeper for advanced imaging
With the federal program paused, radiology benefit managers continue to be the primary mechanism gating CT, MRI, and PET authorization, applying their own criteria independent of any CMS requirement.
Mammography coding and coverage rules held steady
The distinct screening and diagnostic mammography code structure, along with Medicare’s no-cost-sharing policy for screening, continued unchanged into 2026.
Teleradiology continued to expand as a practice model
Remote interpretation across state lines continues to grow as a share of total radiology volume, keeping multi-state enrollment accuracy an ongoing, rather than one-time, operational requirement.
Someone has to know which federal programs are actually still active
A billing checklist built around a program that no longer exists wastes effort and misses what actually governs the claim today.
In-house vs. outsourced
What one biller cannot track across modalities and state lines
| The question | One in-house biller | TruCare |
|---|---|---|
| Component billing accuracy | Assumed from habit | Confirmed against actual ownership and interpretation |
| Teleradiology enrollment | Tracked after a new relationship starts | Mapped ahead of each new facility relationship |
| Mammography coding | Screening and diagnostic sometimes confused | Coded correctly, including same-day conversions |
| RBM authorization | Filed close to the study date | Filed and tracked to a decision in advance |
| Defunct program awareness | Checklists sometimes still reference it | Built only around currently active requirements |
| Interventional radiology | Billed like standard imaging | Coded under its own surgical-style rules |
| Cost shape | Salary, benefits, training, software | A percentage of collections, so it scales with volume |
| Staff absence | Billing slows across the practice | Coverage is handled without disruption |
| Regulatory change | Discovered through a denial | Tracked and built into process ahead of time |
| Visibility | A report assembled on request | Live, by modality and by facility relationship |
Hover a state to see coverage
Where we serve
Radiology billing in every state
Component billing accuracy
Multi-state teleradiology enrollment
Mammography coding
RBM authorization
Interventional radiology
A named account contact
Who we bill every day
Medicare Part B
Medicare Advantage
Medicaid and managed Medicaid
BCBS and Anthem
Centene family
Other
We bill whatever plans your practice is contracted with. If you are not contracted yet, TruCred handles the enrollment.
Radiology billing saver guide
A practice collecting $1.62 million saves up to $32,722 a year by outsourcing to TruCare
| In-house billing | With TruCare | Annual saving | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dedicated billing staff | $73,060 | $0 | $73,060 |
| Billing software and clearinghouse | Varies | Included | — |
| Training, turnover, and coverage | Varies | Included | — |
| TruCare fee (from 2.49% of collections) | — | $40,338 | — |
| Total annual cost | $73,060 | $40,338 | $32,722 |
Example: a practice collecting $1.62 million a year with one full-time biller, at TruCare’s starting rate of 2.49%. Biller cost uses the BLS May 2025 median wage for medical records specialists ($51,140), with benefits at 30% of total compensation. Software and training costs vary by practice and are not counted. We do not replace your front office, we take the claims work off it. Larger groups, particularly multi-state teleradiology practices, are quoted on volume rather than at the starting rate, so a bigger group should not scale this example up.
Want this run on your own numbers?
Talk to a radiology billing expertWhat a practice gains once every component is actually confirmed
“We had been billing the same way for years without realizing our enrollment had quietly fallen behind our actual reading patterns. Once someone mapped where our radiologists were reading against where we were actually enrolled, we found gaps that had been costing us for longer than any of us wanted to admit.”
Dr. Thaddeus Okonkwo
Radiologist, multi-state teleradiology group